JUDAEO-CHRISTIAN

ETHICS AFFIRMED

ANY GOVERNMENT THAT BELIEVES IT HAS RIGHT OR RESPONSIBILITY TO CONSTANTLY CORRECT THE ADULT ELECTORATE FOR 'WRONG' THINKING, CRIMINALISE AND IMPRISON CITIZENS FOR 'HATEFUL SPEAKING', AND TEACH YOUNG CHILDREN THAT THEY CAN JUST CHOOSE THEIR OWN GENDER AND REQUIRE THEM TO ENGAGE IN HOMOSEXUAL ROLE PLAY, HAS SERIOUSLY LOST ITS WAY.

IMPRISONING 'HOMOPHOBES' OR IMPRISONING HOMOSEXUALS, ARE NOT THE ONLY OPTIONS. AND DOING RIGHT BY VULNERABLE MINORITIES DOES NOT HAVE TO MEAN DOING WRONG BY EVERYBODY ELSE.

OUR POLICIES — AT A GLANCE

PUBLIC CULTURE

  • A PUBLIC CULTURE OF TOTALITARIAN 'POLITICAL CORRECTNESS' IS AN UNREAL, DESTRUCTIVE CULTURE FUNDAMENTALLY AT ODDS WITH THE MORAL AND SPIRITUAL REALITIES OF LIFE AND OF THE HUMAN CONDITION. IT IS INCOMPATIBLE WITH FREEDOM AND DEMOCRACY. IT IS NOT A SENSIBLE, SUSTAINABLE BASIS FOR A FREE, ORDERED, CIVILISED SOCIETY.
  • Founded Upon The Personal Sell-Out Of Deliberately Going Against Conscience To The Point Of Taking Anti-Conscience AS Conscience, 'Political Correctness' Is A Truth-Denying, Gender-Denying, Soul-Suppressing, Common Sense-Denying, Age-Disrespecting, Insight-Displacing, Own Behaviour-Disowning-and-Projecting, Rightful Place-Usurping, Dark Consciousness Masquerading As Light.
  • THE FAIR BRITANNIA PARTY WILL RETURN BRITAIN'S 'POLITICALLY CORRECT' PUBLIC CULTURE TO A MODERATE CULTURE BUILT UPON THE ENDURING CONSCIENCE-BASED VALUES OF JUDAEO-CHRISTIAN ETHICS AND COMMON SENSE (Subject To Approval In The Constitutional Referendum).
  • The New Public Cultural Code Taught As 'Life Skills' In Schools and Prisons and Affirmed (Not Constantly Undermined) By The Broadcast Media.
  • A Significant Reduction In Homosexual / 'Transgender' Rights (Subject To Approval In The Constitutional Referendum).

OUR POLICIES

Change does not always represent true progress. The political, cultural, social and moral decay confronting us all everyday in 'modern', 'progressive' Britain, demonstrate to all right-minded folk of all races, from left, from right, whether rich or poor, man, woman, boy or girl, young or old, that something has gone wrong. Badly wrong. The cultural wasteland that we find ourselves in, calls us all to play our part in helping to turn back the clock on the public culture of Britain — in order to TRULY go forward ...

Legislating For Corruption

A PUBLIC CULTURE OF TOTALITARIAN 'POLITICAL CORRECTNESS' IS AN UNREAL, DESTRUCTIVE CULTURE FUNDAMENTALLY AT ODDS WITH THE MORAL AND SPIRITUAL REALITIES OF LIFE AND OF THE HUMAN CONDITION. IT IS INCOMPATIBLE WITH FREEDOM AND DEMOCRACY. IT IS NOT A SENSIBLE, SUSTAINABLE BASIS FOR A FREE, ORDERED, CIVILISED SOCIETY.

Founded Upon The Personal Sell-Out Of Deliberately Going Against Conscience To The Point Of Taking Anti-Conscience AS Conscience, 'Political Correctness' Is A Truth-Denying, Gender-Denying, Soul-Suppressing, Common Sense-Denying, Age-Disrespecting, Insight-Displacing, Own-Evil-Behaviour-Disowning-and-Projecting, Rightful-Place-Usurping, Dark Consciousness Masquerading As Light.

Expressing Itself Through Absolutist Micro-Fault-Finding and A Marching Intolerance Towards Anyone Or Anything In Apparent Conscious or Non-Conscious Non-Compliance With Its Conscience-Rejecting, Common Sense-Rejecting, Shifty-Shuffling Code Of Slanderous Hypocrisies,

Hiding Behind A Wall Of Self-Displacement, Disassociation From Its Own Actions and A Self-Righteous Veneer Of Contrived Gratuitous 'Offendedness', and

Protected By A Bubble Of Self-Referencing Conceit,

Political Correctness Is Cultic Invitation To A Quasi-Religious War On Truth In General and Initiation Into The Deluded (Oc)Cultic Cop-out and Cul-De-Sac Of Futile Vaunting Against Life's Immutable Personal, Moral and Spiritual Realities.

Politically Correct Culture — Founded Upon The Personal Sellout Of Deliberately Going Against Conscience To The Point Of Taking Anti-Conscience AS Conscience

Over the course of the last half century, in the name of 'equality', 'tolerance' and 'progressiveness', a public code derived from real-world, conscience-based values (i.e. Judaeo-Christian ethics) and common sense, has been replaced with a collection of 'politically correct' relativistic, amoral abstractions that fail utterly to acknowledge life's moral and emotional REALITIES.


This new, improved state 'code of morality', by rejecting true moral values, in reality, simply preaches lawlessness — encouraging young and old alike to simply 'take self as standard', and just function from a self-justifying code of conceit.

Whether that self-justifying code of conceit is the fussy rules of OTT social etiquette, the anti-social camaraderie of shared corruption, adherence to cartoon concepts of yobbish 'masculinity' or mindless obedience to the latest round of inhuman state imposition, BY REJECTING TRUE VALUES — which are the only means by which any code or person can rightly, fairly be judged — everyone is encouraged to cry 'persecution' and condemn others every time they experience any interpersonal conflict. With everyone else doing the same thing, the basis is laid for never-ending strife and alienation right across society.

Politically Correct Culture — Creating An Inverted Social Hierarchy Of Slanderous, Self-as-God Hypocrisy That Calls Everyone To Corruption, Self-Betrayal and A Holding Of Others To Impossible, Inhuman Account

Where widespread acceptance of the values of conscience is lacking, there is also simply no longer a genuinely common basis for the respectful interpersonal communication that make a free, civil and ordered society possible. Everyone has nothing but 'rights' — to be flattered and obeyed by others. Whilst everyone else has nothing but 'responsibilities' — to flatter and obey.

With everyone just about the guiltless, egotistical business of seeking to impose themselves and their own little self-worshipping code onto others, it is the most hardened, the most shameless, who rise to social ascendancy in this new inverted hierarchy of hypocrisy.

This culture of self-referencing, self-justifying, unrestrained egotism has inevitably led to the widespread lawlessness and anti-social behaviour now ruining neighbourhoods, permanently impoverishing local nightlife and making incidents of completely unprovoked in-yer-face personal abuse a near-daily occurrence for harmless law-abiding citizens of all ages and both genders just quietly going about their business.


And whilst constantly reproaching law-abiding citizens for their failure to be tolerant, politicians and media relentlessly encourage everyone to adopt an attitude of aggressive, self-righteous intolerance towards anyone unwilling to conform to THEIR new, artificial, destructive state code.



Politically Correct Culture — Empowering The Shameless Usurpers of Truth, Conscience, Gender, Soul, Insight and Rightful Place

Political correctness is a code that :

  • Prevents teachers from taking the necessary effective action against unruly pupils, leading to the widespread breakdown of basic school discipline — OFSTED reporting that fully 50% of school pupils today have a problem with basic behaviour.
  • Grants travellers an effective carte blanche to claim any public land, farmland, school playing field or car park they can force their vehicles onto as their own personal living space, and then systematically set about damaging surrounding property and leaving a massive mess of human excreta and skip loads of assorted household rubbish for others to clear up at taxpayers' expense.
  • Causes town centres to be blighted by (often aggressive) begging and rough-sleeping.
  • Promotes overpopulation, uncontrolled immigration and poor community relations.
  • Causes people to lead increasingly isolated lives, with an impoverished sense of community.
  • Has contributed to one in three children growing up in one-parent families.
  • Promotes the creation of an intrusive, unaccountable quango and stakeholder-based nanny state that controls as it manipulates as it denies.
  • Requires the politicising of the school and college curriculum to such an extent that the (political) global warming myth and the (anti-religious) evolution myth are routinely taught as established scientific fact.
  • Has led to the introduction of politicised, psychobabble-based policing obsessed with public relations and enforcing unpopular laws.
  • Has created a criminal justice system that, for decades, has been seen by the overwhelming majority to be too lenient on offenders and too harsh on the law-abiding.
  • Has created a generation of youngsters a significant proportion of whom take deliberately acting in defiance of their own conscience as basis for their own inner 'code', who take maintaining an attitude of constant total disrespect towards the adult world as their generation's 'moral' obligation, and who take spouting deeply personal abuse of maximum hurtfulness at anyone expecting even the most basic form of considerate or respectful behaviour from them as 'moral' right — conduct and code that amount to a form of psychological Satanism.
  • Relentlessly, blatantly propagandises for the moral equivalence of the homosexual and 'transgender' lifestyles with the natural heterosexual norm — even permitting activists to seek to indoctrinate, initiate and recruit young children (for goodness' sake!) to 'the way homosexual' through blatant, extreme and explicit sexual content in schools (against the known wishes of most parents). Content so blatant, so extreme and so explicit that most adults find it offensive and upsetting!!

[ May all those responsible for conceiving, introducing and presenting the current RSE educational abomination, hang their deluded, damaging heads in shame. ]

  • Imposes 'hate crime' legislation that in the name of minority rights curtails freedom of speech and freedom of conscience.
  • Betrays viewers and listeners to the advertisers, by permitting ubiquitous advertising that overrides human volition itself through unavoidable, deeply-personal adverts that just jump-in mid-programme to ruthlessly target moments of maximum viewer emotional vulnerability.
  • Promotes the belief that minority religious cultures — that promote the subjugation and abuse of women, tyrannical government and the persecution of detractors — have equal moral and cultural value to the western traditions of Judaeo-Christian ethics, freedom and democracy : traditions that for centuries have proven themselves to be the surest foundation for building good character and strong, stable nations.

STARTING IN THE 1960s, AFTER 60 YEARS OF REBELLION AGAINST CONSCIENCE AND COMMON SENSE, BRITAIN, THE WEST AND THE 'MODERN' WORLD MUST NOW FACE THE TRUTH :

That we have been going in the wrong direction.

That if we just continue in the false, foolish belief in the non-existence of moral absolutes with inevitable moral consequences,

then all that lies ahead for us is personal and societal ruin.

SO THAT ALL WE CAN DO NOW IS TURN AROUND AND GO BACK THE WAY WE CAME.

'HOMOPHOBIA'

Homosexuality Is NOT An 'Identity'.

It Is A FAILURE To Identify — With The Gender Of Birth.

The world, the human condition and life's fundamental moral and emotional demands upon us all do not change or cease to exist just because we repeatedly declare it so — to ourselves, to others or to the entire world.

Not even if we huff and puff, and scream and yell, or cry and sob...

Or set our false assertions to music. Or promote them in play, book and film. Or false-accuse others from morning 'til night. Or plead 'persecution' and see 'Nazis' everywhere we look.

Not even then.

Not even a little bit.

As the judge in the American televised 'shaken baby' trial so famously said, "Facts are stubborn things".

The universe's fundamental moral laws are pretty stubborn things too.

It is Life itself that not merely 'allows', but positively requires us all to judge (i.e. discern, not condemn) moral things correctly — or else pay the price in our own character for our lack of discernment, and our failure to affirm the truth and not the lie.

No exceptions to the rule. Not even for you. Not even for me. When it comes to the content of our character, we all reap what we sow — both individually and as a society.

IT IS THEREFORE NO LEGITIMATE BUSINESS OF STATE, POLITICIAN, MEDIA OR MINORITY ACTIVIST GROUP TO OPPOSE PRIVATE CITIZENS, BUSINESSES OR CHURCHES AS THEY SEEK TO LIVE AND JUDGE ACCORDING TO THESE TRUE, FUNDAMENTAL VALUES OF LIFE. The attitudes and principles the 'politically correct' of today denounce as 'homophobic', are simply the common sense-based, conscience-affirming, commonplace moral beliefs and professional opinions of established western tradition. And for the overwhelming majority (outside the politico-media bubble and extreme cultural activist circles) they still hold true today.

Our policies touching this most contentious of areas are therefore proposed as part of this party's desire to see a return to a public culture that encourages respect for government amongst the general population, rather than undermines it.

A public culture that gently calls us to respect and embrace our God-given gender identity, rather than reject it — enabling us to then also truly respect and affirm the boundaries of the gender identity of members of the (complementary) opposite sex : promoting mutual respect between the sexes and marital harmony within the family home.

A public culture that gently calls us all to be the best that we can be.

A best that — for the overwhelming majority — includes (and always has included) the fundamental moral, emotional and social acceptance of the gender identity that accords with the very shape of our own individual human soul, with conscience, with common sense and with the gender of our physical birth.

THE ANSWER TO THE ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL DISADVANTAGE OF HOMOSEXUALS, IS NOT IMPRISONING PEOPLE FOR MAKING 'HOMOPHOBIC' COMMENTS, TRYING TO FORCE THE MORAL ACCEPTANCE OF HOMOSEXUALITY ACROSS THE WHOLE OF SOCIETY, AND ACTIVELY PROMOTING IMMORAL LIFESTYLES TO A NATION'S YOUNG CHILDREN ...

BUT A STRUCTURALLY FAIR ECONOMY WITH GENUINE OPPORTUNITY FOR ALL, WITH THE STRUCTURALLY FAIR AVAILABILITY OF QUALITY HOUSING AND THE ENFORCEMENT OF FIRM-BUT-FAIR GENERAL ANTI-ABUSE LAWS TO SILENCE THE ABUSE-JOCKEYS SPOUTING 'HOMOPHOBIC' (OR ANY OTHER KIND OF) ABUSE. ANTI-ABUSE LAWS THAT ARE FAIR ENOUGH TO BE ACCEPTED BY THE WIDER GENERAL PUBLIC. AND FIRM ENOUGH TO MAKE A REAL DIFFERENCE.

A Significant Reduction In Homosexual / 'Transgender' Rights

(Subject To Approval In The Constitutional Referendum)

In this most contentious of areas, and one of the broadcasters' pet propaganda projects, a clear distinction needs to be drawn between fundamental rights of self-expression for individuals (and with it the need for tolerance by the majority) and the right to require the approval or acceptance by others of any particular lifestyle. Homosexuals, in common with all other citizens, have every right to the former and no right whatever to the latter. 


In making policy in this area, we are also cognisant of the fact that for an overwhelming majority, the homosexual lifestyle is viewed, at best, as very much a 2nd-best option — and this after decades of constant homosexual propaganda by the broadcast media.


We therefore propose the following changes on issues associated with sexual orientation — which, whilst continuing to respect the right of homosexuals, individually, to live as they please, will grant the cultural majority in society (and their children) the fundamental right to live in a land under a PUBLIC culture that reflects their opinions and beliefs on these issues, and not those of an unrepresentative activist minority :

We will therefore offer the British people a right-to-decide on the following homosexual / 'transsexual' rights that have just been imposed on society in recent years without public consent:

ADOPTION NOT PERMITTED BY HOMOSEXUAL COUPLES

The plight of an orphaned child is no place for making self-serving political statements about marginal lifestyles whilst depriving desperately vulnerable infants of the crucial positive parental input that studies (even those by traditionally pro-homosexual organisations) show comes best from a male and female in committed permanent relationship.

HOMOSEXUAL 'MARRIAGE' NOT ENDORSED BY THE STATE

Although people are not married 'before' or 'under' the state in any relationship-meaningful sense (in the way that, for those who believe in God, people are married 'before' and 'under' God), the inherent authority of the state DOES imbue the public commitments made between the betrothed with additional solemnity and personal significance. The decision of heterosexual couples to marry is no less of an immense decision for the fact that it is held at the state registry office rather than in a church. Extending that same state authority to an identical or even similar public ceremony between homosexuals, is for the state to inherently declare that it views committed heterosexual and homosexual relationships as being of equal or similar standing — what an appalling insult to marriage. This is not the kind of thing that any sensible, responsible, moderate government should be doing.

It is also for the state to adopt a stance fundamentally at odds with the beliefs of the overwhelming majority — people that they are supposed to represent.

State-sanctioned homosexual marriage (or any similar state-sanctioned public ceremony) therefore runs the very real risk of so undermining the authority of the state (as marriage licensor) in the eyes of many heterosexual couples as to further deter them from making the deep personal commitment of marriage. Studies consistently show that unmarried couples are more likely to eventually separate — to the detriment of children. Stable marriages are also a stabilising factor within society at large and it is in everyone's best interests that marriages last. The state therefore has a responsibility to strengthen the incentives for heterosexual marriage, not undermine them.

'SEX-CHANGE' PROCEDURES NOT AVAILABLE ON THE NHS

For the overwhelming majority, gender is not altered by genital surgery and hormone treatment — believing gender to be an aspect of human personality rooted at a much deeper level : deriving from the very form of our own physical body (down to the level of cell chromosomes that are fundamentally different for male and female) and the corresponding 'shape' of our human soul.

The identity confusion and gender-dissatisfaction of those undergoing such procedures also often remains post-treatment, with some seeking surgery for the process to be reversed. Many people therefore do not recognise the medical or moral validity of so-called 'gender change' procedures, which they believe should consequently not be available on the NHS.

'TRANSGENDER' INDIVIDUALS TO NOT HAVE THEIR 'NEW' GENDER RECOGNISED BY THE RE-ISSUE OF THEIR BIRTH CERTIFICATE

Many people believe individuals and organisations have a fundamental right to know the true birth-gender of the person they are dealing with, so believe so-called 'Gender Recognition' legislation — that grants 'transsexuals' the right to have their birth certificate re-issued under their assumed gender — should be repealed.

'TRANSGENDER' INDIVIDUALS TO NOT HAVE THE RIGHT TO USE THE TOILETS/CHANGING ROOMS ASSOCIATED WITH THEIR 'NEW' ASSUMED GENDER

'Transgender' individuals using public toilets or hospital wards of their claimed new sex are still perceived by the vast majority to still belong to the gender of their birth, recreating for a great many people the very discomfiture that the whole point of separate facilities removes. People should and must be allowed to use public loos and changing facilities without being confronted by such issues.

'TRANSGENDER' INDIVIDUALS TO NOT HAVE THE RIGHT TO PARTICIPATE IN SPORT UNDER THEIR 'NEW' ASSUMED GENDER

Males assuming a 'female' gender and then competing in women's events puts female athletes and sportswomen at an extreme, unfair disadvantage due to the inevitable, natural skeletal and muscular physical advantages of the male body. Already, 'transgendered' competitors are rising to prominence in many women's events. Over the long-term this trend can only have the effect of discouraging talented women from entering competitive sport — knowing that in all likelihood they will ultimately be unfairly and unnaturally eclipsed even when at the very height of their very considerable prowess.

In addition, permitting 'transgendered' individuals — who almost invariably retain significant and very obvious physical characteristics of their 'previous' disowned gender — to compete and rise to prominence under their 'new' assumed gender, reduces an event that should be a glorious celebration of women being all that they can be, to an unnecessary affront to the deeply-held beliefs of the overwhelming majority (of both sexes).

ALL COMPANIES OPERATING PUBLIC ADDRESS SYSTEMS TO BE REQUIRED TO USE NON-'CAMP' ANNOUNCERS

Recent years have seen supermarkets and train operators increasingly assailing their captive listening audiences with blatantly 'camp'-sounding announcements — the train companies and supermarkets even going so far as to deliberately build a blatant 'campness factor' into the tone of the digital voice used for station tannoy announcements and at point-of-sale terminals! Unbelievable.

Although apparently part of a deliberately-offensive, desensitization strategy designed to instill acceptance (not merely toleration) of 'the way homosexual' into the masses, such an intrusive approach is just as likely to increase anti-homosexual sentiment as diminish it — particularly amongst those most given to anti-homosexual aggressiveness and general yobbishness. And for the majority – of reasonable, responsible, law-abiding adults – such ubiquitous offensive dysfunctional declarations inevitably further undermine respect for government and the law of the land.

We will therefore seek the general public's consent to ensure that Britain's public address systems always use non-'camp' announcers.

In former times and in a less proactively propagandist era, this sort of measure would not be even remotely necessary. Sadly, the determination of some, to use their positions of influence within society or within the marketplace to assail others with their own personal or corporate cultural agenda, mean that continued inaction would amount to a failure to responsibly promote and protect a healthy PUBLIC culture for the wider common good.

TO SAY 'NO' TO SOME HOMOSEXUAL CIVIC RIGHTS IS NOT TO PERSECUTE HOMOSEXUALS — IT IS TO PROTECT THE DEMOCRATIC CIVIC RIGHTS OF THE OVERWHELMING MAJORITY (AND THEIR CHILDREN) AND TO SEEK TO MAINTAIN A HEALTHY PUBLIC CULTURE THAT GENTLY CALLS US ALL TO BE OUR BEST.

In this context, it is perhaps relevant to note that, as a party, we are committed to establishing a sea change in attitudes across society, such that it is the anti-social asbo crowd and the yobbos who feel persecuted and are driven to the margin, NOT the decent law-abiding majority, or racial, sexual or cultural minorities.

So despite the predictable howls of 'homophobia' (typically from those who cry 'persecution' whenever anyone affirms one of life's most obvious, fundamental moral principles : that heterosexuality and homosexuality are NOT morally equivalent), there is no 'green light' here for the persecution of homosexuals. We demonstrate this commitment through our numerous tough policies detailed at length throughout this manifesto in the areas of law and order, education, culture and media reform.

WHATEVER AN INDIVIDUAL'S SEXUAL ORIENTATION OR CONSENSUAL SEXUAL PREFERENCES, IT IS BOTH THE SINCERE BELIEF AND COMMITMENT OF THIS PARTY THAT HE OR SHE WILL, ALONG WITH EVERYONE ELSE, ENJOY A FULLER, FREER, HAPPIER LIFE — AND ONE LESS-TROUBLED BY UNPROVOKED PERSECUTIONS GREAT AND SMALL — UNDER THE POLICIES OF THIS PARTY THAN UNDER THE POLICIES OF ANY OTHER.

'RACISM'

Race Is A Simple Physical Fact Of Birth.

NOT An 'Identity'. And NOT A Cultural Code.

It is NOT 'racist' to believe that racial and cultural minorities should NOT receive ANY favourable or preferential treatment from government, council or law. It is equality. TRUE equality. Anything else isn't.

Making a 'special case' of racial and cultural minorities, with harsher sentences for 'racially-motivated' offences, and allowing exceptions on motorcycle helmet-wearing laws or workplace dress codes and school uniforms for minorities, inherently makes 2nd-class citizens of the vast majority. Such blatantly unfair policy-making can only worsen multicultural relations, not help improve them. What ARE the government thinking?

Neither is it 'racist' to expect that anyone (regardless of their racial or cultural background) who commits a serious offence should go to prison — like everyone else who commits the same serious offence.

And if by imprisoning people for serious offences, a particular minority group is found to be significantly 'overrepresented' within the prison population, then that isn't racist either. Its justice. Anything else isn't.

Imprisoning people is NOT ABOUT QUOTAS (or it shouldn't be). ITS ABOUT THE PROTECTION OF LAW-ABIDING CITIZENS — of all races.

Minority leaders calling their demographic to define themselves by their physical racial characteristics and angrily declaring injustice and racism when describing legal justice simply taking its course, are not exercising honest, responsible civic leadership. If they want to prevent a disproportionate number of their demographic from going to prison, they should discourage their demographic from committing crime — not constantly make excuses for it and blame the entire justice system.

Such excuses and accusations harm the cause of justice and of peaceable multicultural relations, not help establish them. And harm most of all, the true long-term best interests and daily lives of their own demographic — by seeking to keep serious offenders OUT of prison, IN the neighbourhood and ON the street corner : where they continue to make more victims and tempt the vulnerable, fatherless young to a life (and death) of crime.

Further, a culture that encourages minorities to assume that any personal conflict they experience with anyone from the majority culture is essentially always simply due to racism or xenophobia (rather than for e.g. the natural social and moral conflict that is how we all unavoidably challenge and, hopefully, learn from each other), is to simultaneously encourage a weak moral 'cop out' mindset in minorities — discouraging personal growth — whilst attempting to saddle the cultural majority with a miserable, cult-like, open-ended guilt-trip for just honestly being themselves.

A recent trend within the UK fake-news 'mainstream' media, has been to constantly stoke a divisive racial awareness that has done such harm to multiracial relations and the social fabric of America, and ever-threatens to do worse. It is as though lacking the race-based civil war of America's past, our super-duper mainstream broadcasters seek to 'even things up a little' by stoking strife, misery and mayhem here in Britain. We really do need a more responsible, less extreme and less propagandist 'mainstream' media.

In the meantime, may we all resolutely turn a deaf ear to all their — as ever — politically inspired, drivel.

There are many things we would do well to import from US culture, but their dire race relations IS NOT ONE OF THEM. With literally HUNDREDS OF YEARS between current generations and Britain's own shameful involvement with the evil of slavery, and with Britain leading the way in its abolition, it is surely time for ALL OF US to just plain 'get over it', and not allow ourselves to be influenced by the strife-mongers, who would — for their own inglorious political purposes — keep us all forever looking over our shoulders at the respective inglorious pasts of previous generations long-dead.

Instead, may we acknowledge and remind ourselves of the positive reality of our more recent racial pasts, and starting right now, here in the present tense, fix our eyes on a future where we all MOVE FORWARD. TOGETHER. AS EQUALS. AS OURSELVES. AS FREE MEN AND FREE WOMEN. IN A TRULY FREE, TRULY FAIR, TRULY DEMOCRATIC BRITAIN.

So whilst racial difference is a fact of life — TO BE CELEBRATED — defining ourselves and others primarily by race is not only inherently divisive, IT IS — BY DEFINITION — RACIST. It is another damaging, hypocritical, politically correct cul-de-sac.

We would surely all do better to take the words of Martin Luther King to heart, when he appealed for us all to be judged (and by implication judge ourselves), "not by the colour of our skin, but by the content of our character".

THE ANSWER TO RACIAL ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL DISADVANTAGE, IS NOT DIVISIVE PREFERENTIAL TREATMENT FOR RACIAL AND CULTURAL MINORITIES, BUT A STRUCTURALLY FAIR ECONOMY WITH GENUINE OPPORTUNITY FOR ALL, WITH THE STRUCTURALLY FAIR AVAILABILITY OF QUALITY HOUSING, AND THE ENFORCEMENT OF FIRM-BUT-FAIR GENERAL ANTI-ABUSE LAWS TO SILENCE THE ABUSE-JOCKEYS SPOUTING RACIST (OR ANY OTHER KIND OF) ABUSE. ANTI-ABUSE LAWS THAT ARE FAIR ENOUGH TO BE ACCEPTED BY THE WIDER GENERAL PUBLIC. AND FIRM ENOUGH TO MAKE A REAL DIFFERENCE.

'SEXISM'

The Sexes ARE Different.

Viva La Difference!!

The belief that male and female are the same, is based on a superficial and incomplete view of what it means to be human.

From birth, gender is rooted in our very soul — our very personhood.

A personhood — a 'shape of soul' — that is fundamentally different for male and female.

The fundamental shape of our own soul cannot be changed — so gender cannot subsequently be changed.

Failure to properly accept and identify with the gender of our birth, is therefore a failure to accept a real and fundamental part of our TRUE selves.

It is a tragic state of affairs when young men and young women feel inhibited in their expression of genuine appreciation for one another for fear of stinging rebuke for being 'sexist'. Expressing appreciation for members of the opposite sex — precisely BECAUSE they ARE DIFFERENT, and truly 'Other' in their very 'Being' than ourselves — is practically THE most natural thing in the world. And one of life's greatest joys and pleasures and communions.

Such interactions, feelings and beliefs are not the least bit 'sexist'. Far from being an expression of feelings of being ANTI- the complementary opposite sex, they are an expression of genuine APPRECIATION for the DIFFERENT-NESS of the very PERSONHOOD in the complementary opposite sex. It is simple HETEROSEXUAL attraction 'doing its glorious thing'. (Which for those doing most of the complaining and campaigning, is probably the real target.)

Time was, when expressing and explaining such obvious commonplaces of life would have seemed so redundant as to be absurd. Today, however, such sentiments expressed in anything other than the most careful, circumspect terms can lead to controversy, abuse and job loss. WHAT A STATE WE'RE IN. How ever did we get ourselves in this ridiculous predicament?

WOMEN'S RIGHTS CAMPAIGNS : DESCENDING FROM GENUINE GRIEVANCE TO GENDER-DENIAL

It all started innocently enough — through campaigns highlighting restrictive stereotypical social expectations, the abuse of unwelcome physical over-familiarity, and unfair pay and employment rights for women in the workplace. All of these campaigns were well-founded, highlighted genuine issues of poor treatment of women, and brought real and positive change.

But having won necessary legislative change, the campaigns just kept going, and going, and going. In the workplace, they became calls not for fair treatment for women, but equal treatment for women... ... and then calls for equal outcomes for women ...which has today become the bogus yardstick by which to measure employment practices ... inevitably leading to constant unfair accusations against employers for 'failing' to arrive at whatever workplace rights and ratios little groups of extreme activists deem — in their unrepresentative self-appointedness — to be 'non-sexist'. Such campaigns seem long ago, to have left off being about a concern for fairness, and become a drive to promulgate the inhuman, quite unreal, homosexuality-promoting notion that male and female are THE SAME.

Similarly, on the social front, initial JUSTIFIED calls for more respectful, less stereotypical attitudes from (many) men towards women, have steadily extended their reach over time, today becoming the contemptuous, extreme objection to the merest mention of ANY point of difference, at ANY level, for ANY reason. On closer inspection, this absurd, extreme attitude is again seen to contain within it the inhuman, quite unreal, homosexuality-promoting notion that male and female are THE SAME.

LIFE ITSELF IMPOSES A 'MORAL' OBLIGATION TO IDENTIFY WITH OUR OWN GENDER

And yet it is a simple fact of life that men and women, boys and girls, male and female are different. Significantly different. Different not only physically, but emotionally, socially and in the very shape of their soul. Male and female come complete with a genuinely different way of perceiving themselves, their interactions and relationships with others and the world around them. And each gender seems to come with a genuinely different moral expectation incorporated within it by life itself — with men, apparently, held to a higher, harder standard.

Such things are not altered by just declaring gender to not exist. The most effeminate of males remains a male all the days of his life. And the most masculine of females remains a female all the days of her life. Like or lump it, we are all 'stuck with' the gender of our birth. The only sensible thing to do — and the thing that all sensible, well-adjusted, gender-balanced people have always done — is to fully embrace, and rejoice in, the gender and the associated character traits, strengths, behaviours and privileges of the gender of our birth.

So whilst AFFIRMING AND NOT DENYING inner traits within ourselves traditionally associated with the (complementary) opposite sex, part of the moral obligation of life is therefore to hold them inwardly in such a way that they are SUBORDINATE to the traits traditionally associated with our own sex — maintaining (as best we are able) gender balance both within ourselves and in our behaviours, and thereby in turn affirming and encouraging gender balance in those with whom we interact.

THE 'FALL-OUT' FROM GENDER-DENIAL

On the personal level, the denial of gender removes a natural hedge of protection around the human soul that :

  • IN MALES — can lead to an enfeebling passivity, loss of direction, an inability to respectfully relate to other males 'as fellow males', and increased vulnerability to homosexual temptation.
  • IN FEMALES — can encourage an over-identification with the strength of masculinity in males, alienate from the perceived 'weakness' of femininity in females, produce an inability to respectfully relate to other females 'as fellow females', and (to a lesser degree than for males) increase vulnerability to homosexual temptation.

On the level of society :

  • MEN — are constantly encouraged to feel that they are abusers of women if they so much as 'notice' the feminine appeal of a woman in either their outer or inner beauty, in even the mildest, briefest, most subconscious of ways (without explicit prior 'written'(!?) consent). Or else are driven to the opposite extreme of acting out in rebellious, foul-mouthed, yobbishness in order to 'stay strong' and retain a sense of their own masculinity.
  • WOMEN — are constantly encouraged to feel that they are 'failing' their gender (i.e. their new-found genderlessness) unless they are constantly seeking to usurp the very maleness in men, and 'correct' other women who appear to not be sufficiently alienated from their own femininity or who are not sufficiently self-righteously, abusively hostile towards men for being male. And many young women today quite deliberately and hatefully, routinely use their very feminine appeal as weapon to hurt any male that happens to find them attractive.
  • MEN and WOMEN — Increasingly have to fight their way through all this unnecessary emotional and social 'head noise' as they seek to 'get it together'. Once together, the mutual fulfilment of a successful date, relationship, friendship or marriage is under constant threat of ruin by fights over who gets to 'wear the trousers' and unreal, humanity-suppressing notions of genderlessness, that ever-threaten to break out and break them apart again.

THE SOCIAL AND EMOTIONAL IMPOVERISHMENT THAT FLOWS DIRECTLY FROM EQUATING MALE AND FEMALE, BENEFITS NO ONE — EXCEPT THOSE WHO WHETHER FROM PERSONAL INCLINATION OR INHUMAN POLITICAL DOGMA — WRONGLY EQUATE THE SELF-DISPLACING, NARCISSISTIC, CUL-DE-SAC OF SAME-SEX ATTRACTION, WITH THE LIFE-ENHANCING SPRING AND JOY THAT CAN ONLY COME FROM PLEASANT, MUTUALLY-AFFIRMING INTER-SEX RELATIONS.


ALL THOSE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROMULGATING THE UNNATURAL, DESTRUCTIVE DARK CONSCIOUSNESS OF GENDER DENIAL, INSINUATING IT INTO WORKPLACE, FAMILY LIFE AND ALL OUR PERSONAL RELATIONSHIPS, AND LAYING THE CHARACTER-DISTORTING BURDEN OF IT ONTO YOUNG SHOULDERS, SHOULD HANG THEIR HEADS IN SHAME.

IT IS SURELY TIME WE ALL JUST PLAIN STOPPED LISTENING TO THOSE MISGUIDED FOLK WHO ARE SO INTENT ON PROMOTING PERSONAL IMPOVERISHMENT AND SOWING FAMILY AND SOCIETY-RUINING DIVISION AND STRIFE.

'MINORITY CULTURES'

Culture Is NOT The Same As Race. Race Is A Simple Fact of Physical Birth. Cultures However, Embody MANY SIGNIFICANT SOCIAL, MORAL AND POLITICAL VALUES, and Therefore — For The Long-Term Health Of Society — MUST Be Tested and Judged Accordingly.

It is therefore NOT 'racist' to believe that minority religious cultures that promote the subjugation and abuse of women, tyrannical government and the persecution of detractors DO NOT have equal moral and cultural merit with the western traditions of Judaeo-Christian ethics, freedom and democracy.

It is extreme and damaging cultural beliefs that are the issue, NOT the skin colour of the people who happen to hold them.

IT IS IMMORAL TO SET ABUSE AND TYRANNY AT EQUALITY WITH FREEDOM AND DEMOCRACY.

For centuries and throughout the world, it is the western traditions — and NOT the minority cultures — that have withstood the test of time and shown themselves to be the surest foundation for building good character and strong, stable, free and democratic nations.

THERE MUST THEREFORE BE NO RETREAT FROM OUR PROVEN WESTERN TRADITIONS IN MISGUIDED HOPE OF ACCOMMODATION WITH THOSE IMPLACABLY OPPOSED TO ALL WE HOLD MOST DEAR.

A creed must be judged by the fruit that it bears, and not by how loudly it shouts.

THE POLITICALLY CORRECT POLICIES OF RECENT DECADES HAVE NOT ONLY HAD THE INEVITABLE EFFECT OF FURTHER DISTANCING THE ELECTORATE FROM GOVERNMENT, ADDING TO THE DEMOCRATIC DEFICIT, BUT HAVE CAUSED REAL AND SIGNIFICANT DAMAGE TO THE MORAL, SOCIAL AND CULTURAL FABRIC OF BRITAIN.

IN THE HEARTS AND MINDS OF MUCH OF THE ELECTORATE (FROM LEFT AND RIGHT AND FROM ALL WALKS OF LIFE) THE BROAD AND SYSTEMATIC SLEW OF 'POLITICALLY CORRECT' MORAL WRONG-HEADEDNESS DOMINATING BRITAIN'S PUBLIC CULTURE, HAS CREATED A PALPABLE SENSE OF MORAL RUDDERLESSNESS — OUR CULTURAL LEADERS HAVING APPARENTLY GENUINELY LOST THE PLOT!

THE CURRENT BROKEN (BROKEN, OH SO BROKEN!) 'POLITICALLY CORRECT' ...

conscience-condemning, common sense-despising, gender identity-denying, soul-suppressing, age-disrespecting, emotions-damaging, self-displacing, own rightful place-abandoning, others rightful place-usurping, own-evil-behaviour-disowning-and-projecting, morality-as-word-game-playing, mindlessness-encouraging, mind-defiling, infantilising, depersonalising, TRUE-SELF-BETRAYING


cowardice-promoting, homosexuality-preaching, 'transsexuality'-inventing, children-corrupting, gender roles-reversing, parent-child-roles-inverting, adulthood-stealing, disrespect-inducing, intergenerational conflict-exacerbating, parental-rights-usurping, FAMILIES-UNDERMINING

criminality-condoning, law-abiding-citizens-condemning, people-by-skin-colour-defining, unjust-equal-outcomes-pursuing, minorities-spoiling, majority-oppressing, racism-inflaming, lawlessness-encouraging, humanity-objectifying, sectarian, terrorist-tolerating, NATION-BETRAYING

offendedness-as-fake-virtue-claiming, anything-except-the-truth-condoning, social-policy-as-fake-state-conscience, change-for-change's-sake-pursuing, reality-is-what-the-government-says-it-is, abuse-of-dissidents-as-social-responsibility, TEACHING-AS-THE-COMMANDMENTS-OF-GOD-THE-MERE-DOCTRINES-OF-MEN

self-righteous, self-worshipping, pharisaical, cultic, baseless-evil-suspicions-projecting, hateful-hypodermic-180°-hypocritical-half-truths-spouting, diabolical-microfault-finding, HOLDING-EVERYONE-TO-IMPOSSIBLE-HYPOCRITICAL-ACCOUNT

weasel-worded, logic-chopping, truth-suppressing, information-controlling, cause-and-effect-reversing, double-standards-operating, own policies-denying, fact-twisting, statistics-distorting, news-fabricating, myth-peddling, history-rewriting, academia-corrupting, education-politicising, science-subjectifying, desensitising, volition-overriding, brainwashing, groupthink-promulgating, INDIVIDUALITY-CRUSHING

own-morals-inventing, ownership-of-truth-claiming, taking-self-as-the-standard-for-self, taking-self-as-the-standard-for-others, others-according-to-fake-values-condemning, self-as-God-claiming, self-as-God-as-fake-(no)conscience-taking, the-conscience-of-others-defiling, others-from-their-true-selves-displacing, SOUL-MURDERING

moral-freefall-as-'transcendence'-of-conscience, lost-in-the-lie, high-on-acquitting-the-guilty, puffed-up-on-condemning-the-innocent, lies-as-truth, vices-as-virtues, vices-as-'conscience', corruption-as-strength, repaying-evil-for-good, nihilistic, psychopathic, WAR-ON-THE-HUMAN-RACE-AS-'MORAL'-RESPONSIBILITY

control-as-'compassion'-representing, good-as-cover-for-evil-using, citizens-into-corruption-initiating, evil-rites-encouraging, ancient-evils-reviving, people-are-my-possession-believing, the-fundamental-rights-of-others-stealing, CITIZENS'-LIVES-HIJACKING

Covid-fear-mongering, disease-and-death-statistics-exaggerating, children's-education-damaging, parental-roles-usurping, society-dividing, ruinous-fines-introducing, weddings-ruining, funerals-ruining, sport-and-recreation-abolishing, holidays-abolishing, Covid-apartheid-creating, imprisonment-in-own-homes-commanding, abandonment-of-dying-parents-commanding, vaccines-commanding, citizens'-bodies-snatching, COVID-TYRANNY-ESTABLISHING

power-of-government-abusing, electorate-wronging, privacy-abolishing, free speech-abolishing, free press-curtailing, police-politicising, choice-abolishing, democracy-abolishing, parliament-usurping, dystopian, tyrannical, TOTALITARIAN TRANSNATIONAL EMPIRE-BUILDING

... PUBLIC CULTURE — that is cultic call to the fundamental rejection of truth, to personal and societal corruption, to the sterile cul-de-sac of futile vaunting at life's immutable realities, and that is tantamount to cultural Satanism (Yes, really)

— MUST THEREFORE BE REPLACED.

In Jesus' Name . Name above all names. Amen.

DOING RIGHT BY VULNERABLE MINORITIES DOES NOT HAVE TO MEAN DOING WRONG BY EVERYBODY ELSE.

BRITAIN'S PUBLIC CULTURE RETURNED TO A MODERATE CULTURE BUILT UPON THE ENDURING CONSCIENCE-BASED VALUES OF JUDAEO-CHRISTIAN ETHICS AND COMMON SENSE

The Miserable, Uptight Culture Of The 50s OR The Anarchistic, 'Anything Goes' Culture Of The 60s, Are NOT The Only Options.

Change does not always represent true progress. The political, cultural, social and moral decay confronting us all everyday in 'modern', 'progressive' Britain, demonstrate to all right-minded folk of all races, from left, from right, whether rich or poor, man, woman, boy, girl, young or old, that something has gone wrong. Badly wrong. The cultural wasteland we find ourselves in, surely calls us all to play our part in helping to turn back the clock on the public culture of Britain — in order to truly go forward...

We will therefore abolish all the intrusive and draconian 'Hate Crime' legislation that has been both backward step and cultural cul-de-sac, and return Britain's public culture to a moderate, sensible culture that gently encourages acceptance of the collection of conscience and common sense-based values and moral beliefs commonly referred to as Judaeo-Christian ethics.

  • Politicians and media should no longer attempt to play fast and loose with life's moral realities.
  • Politicians and media should no longer preach and promulgate a mistaken 60s-inspired 'anything goes' view of life, that in the name of personal liberty, undermines the distinctions between vice and virtue — encouraging people to live in a self-destructive, immoral manner that offends against the human soul.
  • Politicians, media and the education system should no longer promulgate an aggressive intolerant atheism that encourages the abuse of those who do not subscribe to an amoral relativistic view of life and human relationships.
  • Politicians and media should no longer preach and promulgate a mistaken communistic view of human identity that wrongly equates the truth of the equal worth of every human being with the inhuman notion that the inner structure of every human person is the same, regardless of a person's gender or age — encouraging gender confusion in individuals, unnecessary conflict between the sexes and intergenerational disrespect.

This new sensible public culture would see politicians, media, councils and cultural leaders publicly affirming and promoting the following values and principles :

  • Conscience is real, that it is a vital organ of the human condition and not a mere product of parental upbringing or the collective values prevalent within society. Life goes better and easier if we seek to live in a way consistent with our conscience, acknowledging our imperfections and limitations.
  • Every moral cop-out and false high has its price — at the level of our core nature, we all reap what we sow.
  • Gender is real and fixed and rooted in the human soul and in the morality of conscience, as well as in the physical body. Life goes better and easier if we seek to live in a way that is consistent with our own gender.
  • Life goes better and easier if we maintain a respectful attitude towards our parents and those who are older than ourselves — even if they have many faults and have wronged us personally in significant ways.
  • Everyone is worthy of genuine respect by mere fact of being human — regardless of their imperfections.
  • A true sense of community spirit cannot be built on 60's-style 'anything goes' living and a 'me, me, me' approach to personal self-expression. Under such a public social ethos, it is the rude, the crude, the selfish and the shameless that dominate 'most every gathering — to the personal impoverishment and dismay of 'most everyone else.
  • Neither can a true sense of community spirit just be imposed by government from the outside — that is oppressive control freakery and it crushes and displaces natural human affection. True community spirit can and should be fostered by government, but only in an indirect way so as to leave room for it to arise naturally from within the heart of free individuals.

Such a real-world code is rooted in the very fabric of life and humanity. It is a code that encourages a love of truth and not the lie, and affirms life's obvious injunctions to responsibility, moderation and self-control and the necessity and justice of punishment for wrongdoing followed by compassion and forgiveness. By the fruit they have borne, for thousands of years these values have shown themselves to be the true basis for the formation of good character. Character that itself leads to the politeness and respect for others that is so important in building the pleasant and peaceable society in which we all wish to live.

This basic code should also be supplemented by :

  • An emphasis on being all that we can be and the best that we can be in life — using all of our natural faculties to the full.
  • The teaching that as human persons we consist of spirit, conscience, gender, mind, will, emotions and body, and that life goes best if we live in a balanced way, acknowledging all of these fundamental facets of the human condition and seek to live in step with them.
  • Affirmation of psychology's emphasis on the importance of true self-acceptance and the need to get in touch with deeper emotions, and the importance of boundary-setting in difficult relationships.
  • The promotion of the robust, positive, 'can do' approach familiar to the pathologically emotionally secure.
  • Encouraging the 'live and let live' community-building focus of the peacemakers.
  • A commitment to democracy, love of freedom and hard work.

These are the solid, enduring values that should form the basis of a reformed public code and public culture for the third millennial Britain of the future.

THE NEW PUBLIC CULTURAL CODE TAUGHT AS 'LIFE SKILLS' IN SCHOOLS AND PRISONS AND AFFIRMED (NOT CONSTANTLY UNDERMINED) BY THE BROADCAST MEDIA

The new public code will be taught as 'Life Skills' to children in schools and to offenders in prisons and affirmed and celebrated (rather than constantly undermined) by the broadcast media and the advertisers.


In this regard, much is often made of the freedom of the press and of the broadcasters, but for decades these supposed 'bastions of liberty' have simply been pursuing the political and cultural agenda of a small clique of 'like-mindeds' — to

the significant harm of Britain's democracy and culture. The public culture of a country should call its citizens to be all that they can be and the best that they can be, not constantly override their wishes, call them to 'anything goes' living, and underinform, disinform, pander, patronise and condemn.


If a new, more positive, better culture is ever to take root in Britain it must be protected from the ravages of endless criticism by the broadcasters. In fact, of course, the broadcasters must be the very ones in the vanguard of that change, promoting and promulgating, not merely acquiescing in the face of it.

A MORE JUDAEO-CHRISTIAN CULTURE : A ROAD TO UNITY AND BEST DEFENCE AGAINST EXTREMISM

The artificial values of political correctness also simply don't resonate with true values within, so are incapable of creating a genuinely unifying common culture. In order to unify, the values implicit in the public cultural sphere need to be based upon the realities of conscience and common sense that are shared and experienced by everyone, whatever their race or culture.


This new code would therefore also likely find resonance with those from minority faiths and cultures — people who, along

with most of the ordinary people of Britain, have found the current public culture fundamentally at odds with their genuine and deeply-held personal beliefs.

An honest, sensible, reality-based, inner human life-affirming culture of Judaeo-Christian ethics is also capable of filling much of the inner moral and spiritual vacuum that drives individuals to extremes of belief in politics, in religion and in their personal behaviour. Judaeo-Christian values also quite naturally help provide the essential inner structure often missing in those from chaotic, abusive homes, and for everyone, call forth inner moral resources and inspire us to enlist them in the struggle to overcome our failings and aberrant behaviours. We all need something GENUINELY MEANINGFUL, higher and 'other' than ourselves, in order to 'reach in' and properly direct our inner walk — NOT artificial non-values CONTRIVED by government.

A moderate culture of Judaeo-Christian ethics in the ascendant across society, taught not as rules to be rigidly obeyed in a soul-damaging, soul-crushing way, but as :

-the set of moral laws that accurately describe the 'rules of the game' of human inner life

-the true nature of the world in which we live and move and have our being, and

-as the true moral standard by which to be guided and to which to aspire

would therefore be a significant and natural deterrent to all manner of destructive anti-social behaviours.

IT IS THE BELIEF OF THIS PARTY AND MANY, MANY OTHERS IN BRITAIN TODAY (ON BOTH THE TRADITIONAL LEFT AND TRADITIONAL RIGHT OF UK POLITICS) THAT SUCH A PUBLIC CODE WOULD FORM A MUCH SURER FOUNDATION FOR THE BETTER, HAPPIER, MORE UNITED, MORE FUNCTIONAL BRITAIN OF THE FUTURE THAN THE SHIFTING SANDS OF THE CURRENT COLLECTION OF TRENDY, UNREAL AMORAL-ABSTRACTIONS — ABSTRACTIONS THAT HAVE ALREADY CAUSED SO MUCH UNNECESSARY HARM TO THE CULTURAL AND SOCIAL FABRIC OF BRITAIN.